Index Thing

Index

The Hippo Techo Blog



banner

117 Posts. Displaying page 4 of 12.
Previous Next

Go to page:


Hide All


Software - XP
 
Nov 10, 2006
 
37


Frontpage 2003 Installer Issue

Close ...
When starting Acrobat 6.0 the Frontpage installer starts running (since FP 2003 is already installed this is a pain).
Bit of a saga once again when Microsoft is involved ..

Had a fossick around and found -

C:WindowsInstaller containing 4d22d.msi (this is the FP installer dated from the install of FP2003)

I renamed the file (x4d22d.msi) and then next time Acrobat was run I got an error where the FP installer couldn't locate FP11N.MSI

Did a search and located this file in -

N:MSOCacheAll Users90000409-6000-11D3-8CFE-0150048383C9 containing FP11N.MSI

Using Programs>Accessories>System Tools>Disk Cleanup I tried to clean out the MSOCache folder only to find that it got rid of everything except for the FP11N.MSI, SKU117.XML and some other sub folders - so much for the Disk Cleanup (typical CrapOS where stuff can be installed but never cleaned out). I tried the Disk Clean again but it indicated that the Office files were no longer there so the application thought it had done the job but in the real world nothing had really happened.

I renamed the MSOCache folder (xMSOCache) and still had the problem.

Where to from here then ..

Tried the great Microsoft pantheon of knowledge and found a utility called Windows Installer Clean Up Utility (wicuu2.exe). Well the knowledge base article stated caution when using this thing. It advised that the installed files for the application wouldn't be removed only the surplus install files and registry entries.
I installed and ran the utility only to find that FP 2003 had indeed been uninstalled - on a brighter note I no longer had the problem when starting Acrobat.
I think the concept of this utility is that it is only used to clean out Control Panel>Add&Remove Program remnants for previous applications that have not fully uninstalled.

So I installed FP2003 again and this time I said yes to deleting the surplus install files (the installer gives this option). However that would be too easy and of course the MSOCache folder was still there and of course the installer was in the WindowsInstaller folder as well (now called 3b7ad9.msi ) - of course the problem with the Acrobat interaction resurfaced again.

What was weird is that as I was trying the renaming technique on the 3b7ad9.msi file again when I started up Acrobat the FP CD (which I had left in the drive) actually started spinning and then Acrobat launched with no problem. Ever since everything is OK but why I don't know.

It seems the MSOCache folder is created by Office 2003 as a Local Install feature for future repair/re-install of components without requiring the CD and indeed FP2003 did exactly this. However since I still use Office 97 and the only 2003 app I use is FP then maybe the System Tools Disk Clean couldn't handle this (expecting other Office 2003 files/cabs to delete?).

So in summary the MSOCache folder (which in my case is on the N: drive) could not be deleted using the MS recommendations and since they say in BOLD letters not to use Windows Explorer to do it what was a humble user to do .......?

.....I used Windows Explorer to rename the folder (xMSOCache) and after a week with no problems dispatched it into the dustbin of technocracy ....

Another encounter with the "Daddy knows best" regime of MS & XP.





Software - Apps
 
Nov 06, 2006
 
36


HTMLGate application triggers Office 2000 installation process on startup

Close ...
On startup the Office 2000 installation appears and gives -

The feature you are trying to use is on a CD-ROM or other removable disk that is not available.

Insert the 'Microsoft Office 2000 SR-1 Professional' disk and click OK.

If the Office 2000 CD was installed the following error was encountered -

Error 1305. Error reading from file:
D:PFilesVStudioCommonIDEIDE98Resource1033MSENV2UI.DLL.
Verify that the file exists and that you can access it.

The problem was that the HTMLGate app required the HTML Source Editing tool from the Office 2000 suite. This tool was set as install on first use and HTMLGate was obviously the first app on my PC to require this.

The 2nd problem with error 1305 was a bad block on the Office 2000 CDROM so once the Office files were copied to the C: drive and the faulty DLL found elsewhere the Office install proceeded and fixed the issue with HTMLGate on startup.

The XP system and application error logs were useful in showing the bad block issue and the HTML Source Editing calls.





Software - Apps
 
Nov 06, 2006
 
35


Using SyncBack application with DVD-RAM for backup

Close ...
The freeware version of SyncBack is excellent for doing incremental backups and synchronising files/folders.
Initially however I had difficulty getting it to work with my DVD-RAM recorder.

Recorder: LG 4120B (HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GSA-4120B)

Media: Panasonic 4.7G DVD-RAM

OS: XP Pro SP1

Usefully XP will support DVD-RAM as installed however the support is limited.
The MS driver appears to use a version of the MEIUDF.SYS driver which allows read/write in FAT32 format but only read in UDF format.

Using SyncBack with the MS driver didn't work since the SyncBack application requires UDF devices and the XP driver will only write with FAT32.

Luckily I found an LG driver that improves things a bit.

I just ran the setup.exe and the PC needed to reset but afterwards the SyncBack app worked fine


Addendum:

LG = Lucky Goldstar (Korean manufacturer)
MEI = Matsushita Electrical Industries (Panasonic is a brand along with Technics and others)
UDF = Universal Disk Format (types 1.5 and 2.0)
HL-DT-ST = Hitachi LG Data Storage

Location of LG driver: http://www.besy.co.uk/projects/windows/dvd-ram.htm
Details of MS support: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/283588/en-us





Web - X/HTML/PHP/JS/CSS
 
Nov 06, 2006
 
34


W3C Schema for HTMLPad 2006

Close ...
How the intellisense seems to work-
A document is opened and the tag completion list uses the appropriate .ini file in the datamldefs folder. The decision on which file to use is done on the Doctype in the page (if enabled in the options).
eg: If an XHTML 1.1 page is opened then the list will derive from datamldefsXHTML 1.1.ini
If the Doctype is not checked then the list will be dependent on the language specifications selected in the options.

It is to be noted that HTMLPad has only an XHTML 1.0.ini file which bunches the Frameset/Transitional/Strict variations together.
This file also includes the Ruby tags which only appeared in the XHTML 1.1 standard.

To improve this separate ini files for the XHTML 1.0 variants can be used however to be able to select varying ini files the "Use Doctype to switch specification" should not be checked.

Base file used was XHTML 1.1.ini
Location: C:\Program Files\HTMLPad 2006\data\mldefs\

Original W3C file used was xhtml1-strict.xsd
Location: http://www.w3.org/2002/08/xhtml/

Method:

Cut and Paste using the W3C file as original reference.
The xhtml 1.0.ini file supplied is actually a composite of Strict/Transitional/Frameset.
xml:lang is not catered for and also is not in the 1.1 file at all!

File tips:
name,d=<string> ( ,d indicates the attribute as deprecated)
%endtag=0 ( 0 indicates an empty element, shows as green in Auto tag lists)
action,r=<url> ( ,r indicates a required attribute)

Modified XHTML 1.0 Strict file HERE (rename as XHTML 1.0 Strict.ini)

Modified XHTML 1.0 Transitional file HERE (rename as XHTML 1.0 Transitional.ini)

Modified XHTML 1.0 Frameset file HERE (rename as XHTML 1.0 Frameset.ini)

Template Locations

C:\Program Files\HTMLPad 2006\templates\HTML\

Related usage notes:

Adding custom schema.

Markup browser uses markup.dat ( View>Markup Browser )
HTML Language specification uses html.dat ( Options>Preferences>Language Options )

markup.dat (as installed)
HTML 4.01
XHTML 1.0
XHTML 1.1
WML 1.1
DEDI

html.dat (as installed)
HTML 4.01
XHTML 1.0
XHTML 1.1
DEDI

The files specified (except for DEDI) all relate to the as named files in the mldefs folder. There is no file for DEDI.
Maybe DEDI is short for dedicated and is meant for custom schema - I don't know...

Files can be added to both files and will then be shown as options in the appropriate places.

eg:

markup.dat (as modded) html.dat (as modded)
HTML 4.01 HTML 4.01
XHTML 1.0 XHTML 1.0
XHTML 1.1 XHTML 1.1
WML 1.1 DEDI
DEDI XHTML 1.0 Strict
XHTML 1.0 Strict XHTML 1.0 Transitional
XHTML 1.0 Transitional XHTML 1.0 Frameset
XHTML 1.0 Frameset

Quirk:
If the Markup Browser is used and say XHTML 1.0 Strict is selected the tag list will only appear if the same option is selected in the language options. However if any of the default files are selected the tag lists will appear anyway.
If after selecting a custom file another file is then chosen in the markup list the tag list will only show if the file chosen is one of the default ones. If the original custom file is re-selected then the tag list will not appear until the language option
is reapplied for that file.

If the DEDI entry is removed from both dat files the situation remains the same.

It was noticed also that if say the WML 1.1 entry in the markup.dat file was replaced with a custom file then the Markup Browser would still show the tag list for the WML 1.1 file.

It seems that the default file names are written somewhere else as a hard coded reference....





Web - X/HTML/PHP/JS/CSS
 
Nov 06, 2006
 
33


CSS hover box truncated top with Opera 9.x

Close ...
Problem: A CSS hover span is used within a content div which is inside
an outershell div. Outside the outershell div the hover span box works fine
but inside the hover box is truncated at the top. Opera 8.52 renders the hover
ok as do most other browsers (IE, Mozilla, etc).

Basically to fix the issue I had to alter the outershell top: from 25px to 0px
and the content div top; of 2px was changed to margin-top: 22px;

An example of the problem is shown - HERE

This is how the hover renders after the CSS is tweaked - HERE





Web - X/HTML/PHP/JS/CSS
 
Nov 06, 2006
 
32


XHTML 1.0 MIME type issue

Close ...
This site is designed for XHTML compatibility but really it is just a load of bollocks because of the following situation with XHTML User Agent compatibility.
Basically true XHTML is not supported by any of the IE browsers (which at the moment constitute the majority of browsers in use).
More about this can be found at http://www.hixie.ch/advocacy/xhtml.

With wanderinghippo although the meta tag is set as application/xhtml & xml the mime type sent from the server(which takes precedence with the UA) is actually text/html as is the case with many other XHTML 1.0 sites. This means the UA will not handle the page in a pure XHTML form.

Why then bother with XHTML 1.0 for the hippo?
You may well ask but I like the challenge of creating a compliant page according to the fiendish standards which in reality aren't that bad - just a shame that IE won't support them.

Update: Use of Content Negotiation

So, IE (along with other browsers) won’t support XHTML if the mime type is served as application/xhtml+xml however
by implementing server side Content Negotiation the issue can be worked around to a point.
If the .xhtml extension is used (at least on Apache servers) the mime type served will be application/xhtml+xml.
The method I have tried on my XAMPP dev server and production server (host using Apache) is to add suitable scripting to the .htaccess file.

ADD following to .htaccess file -


# requires mod_headers module on server
Header append Vary Accept

# requires mod_rewrite module on server
RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{HTTP_ACCEPT} !application/xhtml+xml
RewriteRule .* - "[T=text/html; charset=UTF-8]"


Note: I used to use the Abyss web server for dev but found that at this time the .htaccess file is not supported so I changed to the XAMPP web server for dev.

The two required modules for the .htaccess file were uncommented in httpd.conf file and the XAMPP server restarted.





Web - X/HTML/PHP/JS/CSS
 
Nov 06, 2006
 
31


XHTML Myths and Legends - some answers!

Close ...
1 The target attribute has never been included in Strict versions of HTML 4.01, XHTML 1.0 and XHTML 1.1 - it exists in HTML 4.01 Frameset/Transitional and XHTML 1.0 Frameset/Transitional

2 XHTML 1.0 Strict allows both xml:lang and lang with xml:lang taking precedence. XHTML 1.1 allows only xml:lang

3 The name attribute of the <a>, <map> and <form> tags is deprecated in XHTML 1.0 Strict and removed in XHTML 1.1 in favour of the id attribute

4 The name attribute of the <img> tag is removed in XHTML 1.0 Strict but exists in 1.0 Frameset/Transitional

5 The <iframe> tag is not included in XHTML 1.0 Strict

6 The name attribute of the <applet>, <form>, <frame>, <iframe> and <img> tags is deprecated in XHTML 1.0 Frameset/Transitional

7 The <ruby>, <rbc>, <rtc>, <rb>, <rt> and <rp> tags were introduced with XHTML 1.1

8 The following deprecated tags were excluded in XHTML 1.0 -
<applet>, <basefont>, <center>, <dir>, <font>, <frame>, <frameset>, <isindex>, <menu>, <noframes>, <s>, <strike>, <u>

9 Empty elements such as <br /> and <hr /> or <img src="image.jpg" alt="picture" /> are usually typed as such with a space preceding the slash to allow compatibility for older browsers.

10 XHTML 1.0 content presentation should normally be set as "application/xhtml+xml" in the META tag rather than "text/html" (allowed with XHTML 1.0) however if this is the case then IE will not process the content correctly (not supported). Since most XHTML 1.0 pages are presented as .html files rather than .xhtml files the servers normally present the content as "text/html" and so IE will work but not in strict XHTML mode.
11 <!-- and --> traditionally used for comments are still valid outside tags but the content will be ignored by some XML parsers.
Using these tags within script or style tags however should no longer be implemented because XML parsers will parse these tags including any unescaped XML characters - <![CDATA[ and ]]> should be used within these tags.

12 If XHTML is served as text/html background styling on the BODY tag will affect the whole window(including the HTML tag) but if served as application/xhtml+xml then only the BODY tag is affected. If offsets are used with the BODY tag the window will only be fully affected if the HTML tag is styled.

13 The apostrophe character - &apos; was introduced by XML 1.0 so &#39; may be required for earlier HTML browsers.

14 If XHTML is served as application/xhtml+xml then a javascript document.write() will not work because the XML parser is being used.








Web - X/HTML/PHP/JS/CSS
 
Nov 06, 2006
 
30


Adding Macro for XHTML 1.0 Validation to Expression Web Designer

Close ...
The macro facility in EWD can be used to provide XHTML validation in a similar manner to that described for FP at Michael Suodenjoki's site - HERE
(http://www.suodenjoki.dk/us/productions/articles/validation_arti cle.htm)
I found this method can also be used in FP2003

A few tweaks are required for the script to be used in EWD. Please bear in mind that I have used EWD CTP1 and Beta 1 so things may be different on retail releases when they happen.

UPDATE: Still works OK with EW Trial version (which I think may be a RC) and final release version also.

Install:

Fairly similar to section 3.2 of Michael's article
The validate.bas file can be tweaked with notepad or within the VBA editor.

Tools>Macro>Visual Basic Editor
VBA editor will open (different to screenshot)

View>Project Explorer
This will show Module1 which can be deleted

File>Import File
ExecuteCmd.bas (still works OK without tweaks)
Validate.bas (requires some tweaks)
Form_output.frm (OK as is)

These should now show in the Project Explorer
Close the VBA editor and use EW to complete the install of the macro.

Steps 7 to 17 of Michael's instructions are pretty well still OK for EW.

Tweaks for validate.bas

Line 35: MsgBox "Please open a file in the Expression Web Designer.", _
Line 40: If Not ActivePageWindow.ViewMode = PageViewNormal Then
Line 42: ActivePageWindow.ViewMode = PageViewNormal
Line 45: Dim doc As IHTMLDocument
Line 96: ActivePageWindow.ViewMode = PageViewHtml

Note: It can be convenient to tweak the validate.bas file before the import so a master record is kept since the app uses its own macro file once the import is done.

Macro location:
EWD Trial
C:Documents and SettingsuserApplication DataMicrosoftExpressionWeb DesignerMacros Microsoft Expression Web.wdmacro

EWD CTP1 and Beta1
C:Documents and SettingsuserApplication DataMicrosoftExpressionWeb DesignerMacros Microsoft Expression Web Designer.wdmacro

FP2003
C:Documents and SettingsuserApplication DataMicrosoftFrontPageMacrosMicrosoft Frontpage.fpm

Typical output on a "clean" XHTML 1.0 page was -

C:BMCDataStuffBMCWebValidationbinnsgmls.exe: C:BMCDataStuffBMCWebValidationpubtextxhtml1.dcl:31:27:W: characters in the document character set with numbers exceeding 65535 not supported
(Above line always appeared - just never worried about it too much)

C:BMCDataStuffBMCWebValidationbinnsgmls.exe: C:BMCDataStuffBMCWebValidationinput.tmp:10:9:E: character data is not allowed here
C:BMCDataStuffBMCWebValidationbinnsgmls.exe: C:BMCDataStuffBMCWebValidationinput.tmp:25:9:E: character data is not allowed here
(Lines above relate to and being in the user page)





Web - X/HTML/PHP/JS/CSS
 
Nov 06, 2006
 
29


XHTML 1.0 Strict Validation Stuff

Close ...
Notes 'n stuff whilst making an XHTML 1.0 Strict schema file for VWDE and FP 2003.

Unfortunately Visual Web Developer Express 2005 (VWDE) does not have the capability to handle XHTML 1.0 Strict schemas. Provision is made only for XHTML 1.0 Frameset/Transitional and XHTML 1.1 so basically I decided to try and fabricate a schema using the 1.1 file as a starting point since the differences between 1.0 Strict and 1.1 are minimal


Base MS file used was xhtml_strict-11.xsd
Location:
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 8\Common7\Packages\schemas\html

Original W3C file used was xhtml1-strict.xsd
Location:
http://www.w3.org/2002/08/xhtml/

Method:

Cut and Paste using the W3C file as original master reference for 1.0 Strict.

Cross check done with MS xhtml_transitional.xsd and known deprecations.
Basically MS have moved things around a bit but the W3C reference can be reconciled with the MS files fairly well.

W3CMS
tag ::xs:xsd:
coreattrscoreAttributeGroup
i18ni18nAttributeGroup
eventsinputEventsGroup
focusfocusAttributeGroup
attrscommonAttributeGroup
xs:complexType name="Block"xsd:group name="BlockElements"


Known Deprecations :

1.01.1
Langxml:Lang
a namea id
map namemap id
ruby (added)


Also most deprecations in XHTML 1.0 Transitional were removed in 1.0 Strict

The schema files (please feel free to check over the modified file B for accuracy before using - it's a prototype at the moment!)

File A: HERE - This is the original W3C XHTML 1.0 Strict schema file.

File B: HERE - (only use with VWDE) This is the modified MS xhtml_strict-11.xsd file from VWDE retaining original MS element order consistent with the original MS .xsd files (xhtml_strict-11.xsd & xhtml_transitional.xsd). This should give a Strict 1.0 interpretation that is more consistent with the w3c spec.

Installation:
VWD 2005 Express

Reference for this was found at -
http://blogs.msdn.com/mikhailarkhipov/archive/2006/02/01/522614.a spx

Because I have only VWD installed and not the full Visual Studio the registry hack becomes -

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINESOFTWAREMicrosoftVWDExpress8.0Packages
{1B437D20-F8FE-11D2-A6AE-00104BCC7269}Schemas

There were 20 schemas already installed (standard install).

The standard install does not include XHTML 1.0 Strict at all
eg:
Schema 1 - html\ie6_0.xsd
Schema 4 - html\html_401.xsd
Schema 5 - html\xhtml_transitional.xsd
Schema 6 - html\xhtml_frameset.xsd
Schema 7 - html\xhtml_strict-11.xsd
Schema 21 - html\xhtml_strict-10.xsd (I added this one)

FrontPage 2003
This file is adapted from the file modified for VWD 2005. Reference was also made to existing HTML schemas provided with FP 2003.

The schema location is -
C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\OFFICE11\SCHEMAS\HTML

The type-library file from VWD( w3c-dom1-strict.tlb) was also placed in this folder as the xsd file uses it.
FP 2003 does not require a registry entry for the schema as VWD does - a restart is sufficient to make the schema appear in
Tools>PageOptions>Authoring>SchemaVersion(dropdown ).

Reference for this was found at -
http://blogs.msdn.com/lisawoll/archive/2005/01/14/353451.aspx

Note:(finding file locations)
FP 2003 is a module of Office 11
VWD 2005 is a module of Visual Studio 8
EWD is a module of Office 12

Note: Initially I wanted to use the file for FP2003 but because the Intellisense was a wee bit tired I decided to have a go with the new app that will replace FP.

It is Expression Web Designer. You will notice in the above note that VWD is part of Visual Studio 2005 whereas EWD is part of Office as was FP2003. As a result the schema files for EWD vary slightly with the inclusion of fp tags, etc.

Useful web references:

http://www.w3.org/2002/08/xhtml/ (Master W3C xsd files)
http://blogs.msdn.com/mikhailarkhipov/archive/2006/02/01/522614.a spx (Registry hack for VWD 2005 schema addition)
http://blogs.msdn.com/lisawoll/archive/2005/01/14/353451.aspx (Customising Intellisense)
http://schneegans.de/frontpage/xhtml-schema/ (Using XHTML schema with FP 2003 & Visual Studio)

UPDATE:

MS Expression Web Designer is now available as a Community Technology Preview (CTP) package.
As it happens this supposedly supports XHTML 1.0 Strict and the file can be found in -

C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\OFFICE12\SCHEMAS\HTML

This file has some differences to the modified one adapted from VWD.

EWD VWDE
clientom="w3c-dom1.tlb" clientom="w3c-dom1-strict.tlb"
cssschem a="CSS 2.0" cssschema="CSS 2.1"
<xsd:documentation> <xsd:documentation>
Microsoft Visual Studio .NET Microsoft Visual Studio .NET
schema for HTML 4.01 schema for XHTML 1.0
omitted <xsd:attribute name="Style" vs:builder="style" />


Unfortunately the XHTML 1.0 xsd support in EWD doesn't look too good so I will try to adapt the EWD file to be a bit closer to the W3C one.

UPDATE:

Expression Web Designer (EWD) is now known as Expression Web and is available as a trial version. Having looked at the fresh install I find the XHTML 1.0 xsd is still a bit dodgy but the app seems to work well as a replacement for FP2003. The only thing I am not keen on is the high price given that the XHTML 1.0 Strict functionality appears to be lacking.

File C: HERE - MS XHTML 1.0 Strict file supplied with EWD CTP1 and Beta 1.

File D: HERE - MS XHTML 1.0 Strict schema file supplied with EW Trial.

Differences are -
Addition 1
<!-- style info, which may include CDATA sections -->
EWD Beta 1
none
EW Trial
<xsd:enumeration value="default" />

Addition 2
<!-- script statements, which may include CDATA sections -->
EWD Beta 1
none
EW Trial
<xsd:enumeration value="default" />

Change 3

EWD Beta 1
<xsd:attribute name="xml:Space" default="preserve" fixed="true" />

EW Trial
<xsd:attribute name="xml:Space" vs:readonly="true" fixed="true">
<xsd:simpleType>
<xsd:restriction base="xsd:string">
<xsd:enumeration value="preserve" />
<xsd:enumeration value="default" />
</xsd:restriction>
</xsd:simpleType>
</xsd:attribute>

Change 4
xsd:attributeGroup name="cellHAlignTypeAttributes"
EWD Beta 1
<xsd:attribute name="Ch" />
<xsd:attribute name="ChOff" />

EW Trial
<xsd:attribute name="Char" />
<xsd:attribute name="CharOff" />

In theory a modified file for use with EW should also work with FP2003 but I seemed to have a few hassles with the Intellisense in FP particularly in the area of Byte Order Marks (BOM), the DOCTYPE and using UTF-8 so any effort is now directed towards EW. A good feature in HTMLPad 2006 that I also use is being able to save a page without the BOM.

File F: HERE - This is the modified xhtml file for EW Trial (still doing it.....).





Web - Apps
 
Nov 06, 2006
 
28


Microsoft Web Authoring Tools

Close ...
The other day I was messing about with some new Microsoft web authoring apps and here is my experience so far.

Frontpage 2003 - the app I tend to use
Visual Web Designer 2005 Express - available free
Expression Web Designer CTP1 - beta trial

I tend to use FP 2003 for XHTML/HTML work and Notepad++ for CSS but FP is now getting a bit tired. The big feature I like is the tabbed preview which is quick (albeit based on the IE rendering engine) and the code view is used a bit. The ability to work within a web is excellent for hyperlinking and renaming functions but the biggest drawback is now the XHTML standards support. I presently try to code for XHTML 1.0 Strict.
The macro facility in FP can be used to provide XHTML validation which has proved to be excellent but the inbuilt Intellisense support is weak. I have found that this can be improved a bit using a file derived for use with one of the later MS apps.
Trying VWDE I found the app only really does the HTML/XHTML editing part of what FP does without the web environment. Also despite being much improved in code creation, etc it still doesn't support XHTML 1.0 Strict for Intellisense.
So, my answer was to modify the MS copy of the XHTML 1.1 Strict schema in VWDE and use that (See above for more details).
Since messing around with VWDE MS have issued a CTP trial of EWD and this app is basically the new Frontpage. Interestingly the XHTML 1.0 Strict schema file used looks a bit dodgy in places



117 Posts. Displaying page 4 of 12.
Previous Next

Go to page: